The People News, a free newspaper serving Cleveland Tennessee (TN) and Bradley County Tennessee (Tn).





Of Bradley County Tn.


OCTOBER  2009

                            The People News, a free newspaper serving Cleveland and Bradley County Tn.

Feature Writers

HOME

BACK ISSUE ARCHIVE

EDITORIALS

LETTERS

CONTACT US

Feds Keep Little-used Airports in Business
Local subsidies help private airplane owners avoid landing
fees and passenger taxes.

If you also want to rolex replica uk buy a suitable watch, then these things you better know in replica rolex advance. Because the wrist watch with the thickness of replica watches uk your wrist is very important. If your wrist or palm is thick, then choose to swiss rolex look bigger, thicker dial.

HEALTH

TONYA'S TALES 

SPECIAL REPORT

TN.  MOCKINGBIRD

A PERSONAL VIEW

COLUMNIST

SPORTS

COLUMNIST

MATTER OF FAITH

JENNIFER'S CORNER

ASHLEY'S AVENUE

FEED BAG

WW II SECRETS

READ ALL ABOUT IT


KATIE'S SPOT

CHLOE

B J Armstrong

Tonya Brantley


Alexandra Edwards


June Griffin


Mel Griffith


Ned Hickson


Jerry Keys


Joe Kirkpatrick


Joel Lawler


Jennifer Martin


Ashley Murphy


Pauline Murphy


Cecil Owen


Pettus Read



Katie McFadden


Chloe Lawler


by Thomas Frank
USA Today
September 17, 2009

Williamsburg, Ky. -- One of the USA's newest airports has a 5,500-foot lighted runway, a Colonial-style terminal with white columns, and hundreds of acres for growth. But Kentucky's Williamsburg-Whitley County Airport lacks one feature: airline passengers.


Built using $11 million in federal money, the airport is used only by private airplanes. Many are piston-engine aircraft owned by residents such as Keith Brashear, the airport board chairman who keeps his two-seat Cessna in the airport hangar. On a typical day, the airport has just two or three flights, manager Jessica Roberts says. Some days, there are none. The Williamsburg airport is the result of an obscure federal program that raises billions of dollars a year through taxes on every airplane ticket sold in the United States. The taxes can add up to 15% to the cost of a flight -- or about $29 to a $200 round-trip ticket. Federal lawmakers have used some of the money to build and maintain the world's most expansive and expensive network of airports -- 2,834 of them nationwide -- with no scheduled passenger flights.

EDITORIALS

JOKES & HUMOR


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR


CARTOONS

A fun way to find what
you want in Cleveland

Cleveland-Bradley
Business Online

www.ClevelandBradleyBusiness.com


Known as general-aviation airports, they operate separately from the 139 well-known commercial airports that handle almost all passenger flights. In the first full accounting of the 28-year-old Airport Improvement Program, USA TODAY found that Congress has directed $15 billion to general-aviation airports, which typically are tucked on country roads and industrial byways.

Members of Congress say the general-aviation airports can attract development and provide services such as air-medical transport. The lawmakers also regularly use general-aviation airports to get around their districts and states, sometimes in planes with lobbyists. Members of Congress took 2,154 trips on corporate-owned jets from 2001 to 2006, according to a 2006 study by PoliticalMoneyLine, an independent research group.

Critics say the number of subsidized airports with no commercial flights is excessive at a time when larger airports are struggling to deal with delays in air traffic, and that much of the money the general-aviation airports get benefits only a few private pilots. "Congressmen are spending millions building runways at these little airports. That is just a complete waste of money," says Jonathan Ornstein, CEO of Mesa Air Group, a regional air carrier. "There is a huge requirement to overhaul infrastructure at major airports."

General-aviation airports handle mostly recreational planes and corporate jets -- usually just a few each hour. Half of the airports are within 20 miles of another private-aviation airport, a USA TODAY analysis shows. The Airport Improvement Program gives money to about 2,000 airports each year for projects such as runway repairs and noise mitigation. The money goes to all types of airports -- general-aviation and commercial -- that apply to the Federal Aviation Administration Administration (FAA) for grants.

Lawmakers have expanded annual funding by 10 times since 1982, as increasing air travel brought in more money in ticket taxes. They also have steered growing sums to general-aviation airports by rewriting federal law. The funding for such airports soared from $470 million in 1999 to $1 billion in 2007 -- even as private flying declined by 19% during that period. (Even so, the USA has 231,000 private airplanes -- more than twice as many as every other country in the world combined, according to the General Aviation Manufacturers Association.) This year, the small airports are receiving a record $1.2 billion.

The escalating funding came as commercial hubs faced the worst airline delays ever. A multibillion-dollar plan to avert gridlock in the skies has been delayed because the U.S. government has spent too little money building a new system to guide commercial flights, former Federal Aviation administrator Marion Blakey says. The little-used airports are often in residential areas, drawing fire from neighbors who say they create noise and pollution while benefiting a small group of airplane owners.

In Carroll County, Md., 35 miles northwest of Baltimore, 1,800 people have signed petitions opposing a proposed longer runway at the Carroll County Regional Airport that would be designed to handle larger private planes. Tad Rau, whose house is a quarter-mile from the airport next to a farm, blames the federal program, which would pay for $70 million of the $74 million runway. "That's a major reason why the county commissioners want to do this -- they really don't have to fund any of the cost," Rau says.

Other findings: General-aviation airports are vastly underused. A USA TODAY analysis of aviation plans in seven states indicates that more than half of their 312 general-aviation airports operate at less than 10% capacity.

Back Issue
Archive

Click here to go to latest issue

What Do You Think?
SURVEY

Do you believe Cleveland's new airport is primarily being built for the benefit of a few wealthy and politically influential people?
(see story this page)

Totals for this survey will be tabulated at the end of October 2009.
Click here for results after October

The People News
PO Box 3921
Cleveland TN. 37320
(423) 559-2150  Fax 559-1044

Pete Edwards, Editor - Publisher
Tonya Brantley, Managing Editor

Ashley Murphy, Media Assistant
Copyright 2009 (All rights reserved)


Nearly 90% operate at less than one-third of their capacity, well below the rates of larger airports that serve commercial passengers. Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, for example, operates at 79% of capacity. Norfolk International, a small passenger airport in Virginia, is at 64%. The seven states - Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Indiana and Virginia - were analyzed because they keep data on airport capacity.

Three-quarters of general-aviation airports lose money every year and stay solvent only with cash from local taxpayers, says Vitaly Guzhva, a finance professor at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Florida. "An awful lot of them are in very deep financial trouble," airport consultant David Plavin says.

The city of Benson, Ariz., population 5,000, gave its airport $82,000 last year to pay 77% of the operating costs. The airport, built in the 1990s using $8 million in federal money, sees just 21 planes a day, FAA records show. That's half the number that city consultant Coffman Associates had projected in 1990. "There probably will always be a little bit of support from the city," Benson City Manager Glenn Nichols says. The airport plans to nearly double the length of its runway - using millions of dollars from the federal government - so it can handle small jets that Coffman said would use a longer runway.

The U.S. government pays such a large share of capital costs at general-aviation airports - 95% - that a lawmaker who co-wrote the 2003 law setting that rate now says it's "too high." "It looks like a 100% grant," says Rep. James Oberstar, D-Minn., chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, who has proposed a 90% federal share. "It's free money," says Steve Ellis of Taxpayers for Common Sense. "It encourages pie-in-the-sky projects." Nearly 2,400 airports have received $10 billion combined in federal dollars while handling fewer than 80 flights a day, according to FAA flight estimates. Most of the flights carry only a few people. Chicago's O'Hare International Airport handles that many flights in a half-hour. "Do we need them all? No. Some of them are expendable," says Roger Moog, chief aviation planner at the Philadelphia-based Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission.

Read Rest of Story

.

Editorials

Website Survey Results

Salute to our troops


Eleven and Counting

.

HOME

BACK ISSUE ARCHIVE

EDITORIALS

LETTERS

CONTACT US